Class Act
Happy Americans look on as President George W. Bush signs the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 on February 18; legislation aimed at discouraging multimillion-dollar class-action lawsuits against large corporations. Even as he signed it he made clear that he had his sights set on much broader restraints.
Next up, Bush said, should be curbs on asbestos litigation and medical malpractice awards.
Some might note that under Vice President Dick Cheney, Halliburton's Kellogg Brown & Root unit -- the single largest benefactor of no-bid support contracts in the War on Terror -- entered bankruptcy protection to avoid paying billions of dollars in class action awards regarding, specifically, asbestos litigation. Halliburton was represented in several such actions by Houston law firm Vinson & Elkins, whose rising star employee at the time was -- you guessed it -- Alberto Gonzales. Mr. Gonzales went on to become Texas Supreme Court Justice for a year, during which time the courts overthrew a $2.6m finding against Halliburton's KBR even amid evidence of a full court judicial pay-off. He did not recuse himself.
No kidding -- Google "Halliburton" and "asbestos" and tell me that you don't see a connection to this legislation.
Also, why the hell are legally bankrupt companies even considered for multi-billion dollar government contracts, bid or no-bid?
I guess that's why they call it a bill.
Next up, Bush said, should be curbs on asbestos litigation and medical malpractice awards.
Some might note that under Vice President Dick Cheney, Halliburton's Kellogg Brown & Root unit -- the single largest benefactor of no-bid support contracts in the War on Terror -- entered bankruptcy protection to avoid paying billions of dollars in class action awards regarding, specifically, asbestos litigation. Halliburton was represented in several such actions by Houston law firm Vinson & Elkins, whose rising star employee at the time was -- you guessed it -- Alberto Gonzales. Mr. Gonzales went on to become Texas Supreme Court Justice for a year, during which time the courts overthrew a $2.6m finding against Halliburton's KBR even amid evidence of a full court judicial pay-off. He did not recuse himself.
No kidding -- Google "Halliburton" and "asbestos" and tell me that you don't see a connection to this legislation.
Also, why the hell are legally bankrupt companies even considered for multi-billion dollar government contracts, bid or no-bid?
I guess that's why they call it a bill.
1 Comments:
Here's the thing. All this sheot is true and all of it disturbing. While F9/11 got some superb publicity it still didn't close the door on W. There's certainly enough material: Halliburton, Saudi Links, overt corporate handouts, the fictions behind the war, historical drug use... the list goes on. What we *need* is a new untainted mouthpiece to distill these things into an easy-to-digest & understand set of memes. While Michael's good, the media has succeeded in painting him in a certain coloUr. No matter how accurate his subsequent work is, he'll still be the liberal who is not afraid to lie. Maybe that's a required compromise as a) He's good and b) He can get the backing to build one or more media items - movie, spots, etc.
I would think that whatever messages are put forth, they're tight and difficult to argue against. A single powerpoint slide worth of info with 5 bullets. We need 5 phrases that have the same commonplace feeling as "War on terror" and such. My 2c anyway. In short, we need to lose a bit of the nuanced message because the nuance is lost and spun. We're in a world of sound bites. Nobody knows *why* Kerry voted for the bill before he voted against it. Nobody.
Post a Comment
<< Home